Does the number of people you’ve made out with matter? What does it say about you? We discuss this and enjoy a musical performance.
The Panel: Rudy Gilman, Gun Street Girl, Will
Poll: On the right, please answer the poll question. A subject I wish had been discussed further in the podcast is whether or not you're missing out on something in life by not kissing lots of people and seeing what life has to offer. If you could, John Rawls-style, decide how many people you wanted to kiss in your life before your life actually started, how many would you pick? I'd want as high a number as possible, but from the discussion in the podcast, I seemed to be in the minority with that view.
The Debate: GSG thought the number is irrelevant. She never even thought about the subject before this episode. Rudy thought that the number colors how people look at you.
I asked GSG if she would care if a guy she was with had kissed 300 or 0 people. She considered having kissed no one to be strange, but would be more creeped out by a guy who off-hand knew the exact number of people he had kissed. I pointed out that I take a lot of flak not for knowing the exact number, but for having a generally high number, regardless of what that high number may specifically be. People may think my kisses are less valuable since they are more common. GSG says that, besides a Barney Stinson-like list (see also this), it would never cross her mind.
Rudy says that the number matters, though less than the sex number. Rudy said he would probably feel weird around a girl that kissed 35 guys a year. GSG would run away from men who thought like that. I said girls often felt that way and GSG felt those girls needed to get a life.
I mentioned my friend Chris from college who had a reputation for kissing a lot and I overheard girls speculate about wanting to kiss him because he kissed so much he had to be good at it. GSG thought that he must have had other benefits going for him that got him so many girls to kiss, not believing that kissing a lot made him a better kisser. I said that George W. Bush became a much more adequate speaker late in his administration after having had to give so many speeches. (but see this and this)
Rudy pointed out that experienced kissers whose experience comes from bars and random makeouts does not give room for improvement, for lack of feedback and lack of the opportunity to show off actual skill. I responded by saying that there are two kinds of kissing knowledge: 1) basic kissing and 2) in-depth pleasuring of a specific individual. Being in a long term relationship provides a lot of the second kind of information but not so much of the first. Lots of random one-time make-outs provides a lot of the first and not so much of the second.
GSG disagreed, arguing that only after being in a relationship for awhile will a girl provide any feedback at all, thus leaving a promiscuous maker-outer to just keep staying bad, albeit with a lot of people. Rudy pointed out that he had been criticized on a first kiss. So have I. Rudy, though, said he was frustrated by how quickly the feedback came and would have preferred it come later on when it became apparent that the pair would be kissing regularly. He definitely was confused why the feedback came at the end of the kissing, when he could have used the advice earlier in the make-out to improve the rest of that very session.
I pointed out that if you kiss lots of people, statistically you'll kiss people that give you feedback, even if the majority are less willing to offer their thoughts. GSG questioned my reasoning. I argued that if it's random who gives criticism and who doesn't and you randomly kiss a bunch of them, you'll end up with some feedback-givers. I conceded, however, that who you kiss isn't entirely random and the correlation between who gives feedback, who you kiss and whether the advice they give is legitimate isn't random either. Instead, people who kiss a lot arguably are more interested in the pleasure of it and thus know what works for them and are comfortable talking about it, thus I'd contend that if you kiss other people who kiss a lot, then they will likely give you feedback. On the other hand, if you kiss people who do not kiss other people a lot, there is a chance they will keep their thoughts to themselves at a higher rate. These past two sentences, though, are total guesses, but illustrate how my assumptions of randomness may not be true.
GSG added that people who kiss a lot and are up front with feedback are themselves a minority and thus their kissing feedback is likely inapplicable to the general population. They may prefer things that quieter people do not, and thus despite hearing only their advice, their advice may not work on the rest of society. I mentioned that in Episode 10, we discussed how not all feedback is vocal but instead comes from mirroring and setting a good example.
Review: Our own numbers
This group wrote a song specifically for this program and performed it for the first time here in the studio. The lyrics to the song will be posted shortly.
I asked the group after the song about "kisses in the springtime" versus "kisses in the fall" and whether kissing improves with experience. Lachlan said that once you really know mouths, you're more confident and able. He added, though, that when a mouth is new there's a novelty and excitement that may be more pleasurable.
Emma pointed out though that kissing skill tells you a lot about a person. Sasha said that kissing is all about communication. By that logic, though, I would contend that experience in kissing, like in life, makes you a deeper person.
I asked Sasha about his solo, which was very intense, and how that was inspired by kissing. He said it's a communication of the feelings in his soul, a way to be "emotionally naked" so he doesn't know where the music will take him, which he said is exactly like kissing, where you open yourself up to the feelings not knowing where they'll go.
Lachlan pointed out that there's a vulnerability and trust involved in collaborative music and in kissing wherein you follow a feeling or a person instead of mechanically playing notes or moving your tongue. Charlie added that music is emotional, just like kissing, but neither are what occupy most of your time.
Listen Now:
The Panel: Rudy Gilman, Gun Street Girl, Will
Poll: On the right, please answer the poll question. A subject I wish had been discussed further in the podcast is whether or not you're missing out on something in life by not kissing lots of people and seeing what life has to offer. If you could, John Rawls-style, decide how many people you wanted to kiss in your life before your life actually started, how many would you pick? I'd want as high a number as possible, but from the discussion in the podcast, I seemed to be in the minority with that view.
The Debate: GSG thought the number is irrelevant. She never even thought about the subject before this episode. Rudy thought that the number colors how people look at you.
I asked GSG if she would care if a guy she was with had kissed 300 or 0 people. She considered having kissed no one to be strange, but would be more creeped out by a guy who off-hand knew the exact number of people he had kissed. I pointed out that I take a lot of flak not for knowing the exact number, but for having a generally high number, regardless of what that high number may specifically be. People may think my kisses are less valuable since they are more common. GSG says that, besides a Barney Stinson-like list (see also this), it would never cross her mind.
Rudy says that the number matters, though less than the sex number. Rudy said he would probably feel weird around a girl that kissed 35 guys a year. GSG would run away from men who thought like that. I said girls often felt that way and GSG felt those girls needed to get a life.
I mentioned my friend Chris from college who had a reputation for kissing a lot and I overheard girls speculate about wanting to kiss him because he kissed so much he had to be good at it. GSG thought that he must have had other benefits going for him that got him so many girls to kiss, not believing that kissing a lot made him a better kisser. I said that George W. Bush became a much more adequate speaker late in his administration after having had to give so many speeches. (but see this and this)
Rudy pointed out that experienced kissers whose experience comes from bars and random makeouts does not give room for improvement, for lack of feedback and lack of the opportunity to show off actual skill. I responded by saying that there are two kinds of kissing knowledge: 1) basic kissing and 2) in-depth pleasuring of a specific individual. Being in a long term relationship provides a lot of the second kind of information but not so much of the first. Lots of random one-time make-outs provides a lot of the first and not so much of the second.
GSG disagreed, arguing that only after being in a relationship for awhile will a girl provide any feedback at all, thus leaving a promiscuous maker-outer to just keep staying bad, albeit with a lot of people. Rudy pointed out that he had been criticized on a first kiss. So have I. Rudy, though, said he was frustrated by how quickly the feedback came and would have preferred it come later on when it became apparent that the pair would be kissing regularly. He definitely was confused why the feedback came at the end of the kissing, when he could have used the advice earlier in the make-out to improve the rest of that very session.
I pointed out that if you kiss lots of people, statistically you'll kiss people that give you feedback, even if the majority are less willing to offer their thoughts. GSG questioned my reasoning. I argued that if it's random who gives criticism and who doesn't and you randomly kiss a bunch of them, you'll end up with some feedback-givers. I conceded, however, that who you kiss isn't entirely random and the correlation between who gives feedback, who you kiss and whether the advice they give is legitimate isn't random either. Instead, people who kiss a lot arguably are more interested in the pleasure of it and thus know what works for them and are comfortable talking about it, thus I'd contend that if you kiss other people who kiss a lot, then they will likely give you feedback. On the other hand, if you kiss people who do not kiss other people a lot, there is a chance they will keep their thoughts to themselves at a higher rate. These past two sentences, though, are total guesses, but illustrate how my assumptions of randomness may not be true.
GSG added that people who kiss a lot and are up front with feedback are themselves a minority and thus their kissing feedback is likely inapplicable to the general population. They may prefer things that quieter people do not, and thus despite hearing only their advice, their advice may not work on the rest of society. I mentioned that in Episode 10, we discussed how not all feedback is vocal but instead comes from mirroring and setting a good example.
Review: Our own numbers
- Me: I took a pen and paper in 2006 and tried to write down every one I ever kissed. It took awhile and it's not as if I was able to name them all immediately off the top of my head. I was able to name about 150 people. I recognize that my memory fades, there are people I can't remember now that I could remember back then. But I would now estimate my number to be in the 300-range in 2009. I noted that when I started college in 2000, my make-out number was 2.
- Rudy: Rudy noted that making a list like this is similar to watching the AFI Top 100 Movies. Rudy believes his number is between 50-100. Rudy noted that he had a very prosperous youth, then in high school he had a lull that did not end until college and post-college. Liz is confused that Rudy kissed people at the age of 7, asking if he hooked up with Roman Polanski. Rudy responded that Queens had more youthful making out. I asked him if that early exposure changed him and he responded that it made the lull very difficult. I agreed that when I had a lull, the Great Drought of '99, the time without making out once I had been used to it was even more painful.
- GSG: 30-40. I posited that girls have lower numbers than guys, though this may be due to the bias of guys over-reporting and girls under-reporting or due to the stigma girls feel about being labeled sluts (almost entirely imagined except by other women, by the way, though Rudy disagreed in the debate). GSG posited that, in the world of heterosexual kissing, the numbers need to be about even. I disagreed since one guy can kiss many girls, upping his numbers but keeping the various girls at a smaller number. I asked her if she wanted to kiss more to experience some making out that's still out there. GSG said that though she's had unrealized crushes, she's content that she's kissed people in general that she's wanted to kiss. This reminds me, however, of my own attitude about travel before I really started to travel. I believe there's a whole world of kissing out there that we are sadly on this Earth too short a time to come close to fully exploring. My old law professor in Denmark, however, told me that women all over the world kiss the same, so maybe that world isn't that big.
This group wrote a song specifically for this program and performed it for the first time here in the studio. The lyrics to the song will be posted shortly.
I asked the group after the song about "kisses in the springtime" versus "kisses in the fall" and whether kissing improves with experience. Lachlan said that once you really know mouths, you're more confident and able. He added, though, that when a mouth is new there's a novelty and excitement that may be more pleasurable.
Emma pointed out though that kissing skill tells you a lot about a person. Sasha said that kissing is all about communication. By that logic, though, I would contend that experience in kissing, like in life, makes you a deeper person.
I asked Sasha about his solo, which was very intense, and how that was inspired by kissing. He said it's a communication of the feelings in his soul, a way to be "emotionally naked" so he doesn't know where the music will take him, which he said is exactly like kissing, where you open yourself up to the feelings not knowing where they'll go.
Lachlan pointed out that there's a vulnerability and trust involved in collaborative music and in kissing wherein you follow a feeling or a person instead of mechanically playing notes or moving your tongue. Charlie added that music is emotional, just like kissing, but neither are what occupy most of your time.
Listen Now:
[29:34m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download | Embeddable Player | Hits (0)
